A coherent argument is best described as

• A. randomly assembled points
• B. based on speculation
• C. logically consistent and well-organized
• D. based solely on anecdote

Answer: (C)

Coherence and organization are essential for a strong argument: ideas must connect logically and be arranged in a clear, orderly way so that each point supports the next and leads to a solid conclusion. A coherent argument starts with a clear claim, follows with reasons and evidence that directly back it, and uses transitions that show how each part relates to the overall point. It avoids contradictions and irrelevant details, making the reasoning easy to follow and the conclusion credible.

That’s why a description of a coherent argument as logically consistent and well-organized fits best. The other options describe aspects that undermine coherence: randomly assembled points lack a logical path; speculation relies on guesses rather than reasoned support; and basing everything on anecdote depends on personal stories rather than systematic reasoning.